No, I'd never heard of the fucker either. But thanks to the Ambush Predator, I read this article in the Graun:
All those working with vulnerable children must ask the right questions and make the right call for the sake of the child. They need sufficient skill, experience and courage to challenge parents and carers effectively. And they need enough time to spend with families and proper support to do their investigations. Dedicated professionals successfully protect thousands of children every year. But frankly they are being overwhelmed by the scale of child abuse.
Sorry, Wes, but I don't fucking believe you when you say that the scale of child abuse is overwhelming. What I do believe is that the cunts at the NSPCC are directly responsible for criminalising normal disciplining of children. So fuck off with your sanctimonious sermonising, especially since it's just a fucking advert for the NSPCC anyway. Cunt.
And while I'm on about this bunch of mini-Hitlers who are sucking the state's monetary cock in a HUGE way and promoting the progressive agenda, just look at this bunch of quangocrats. Now look at how much they "give" to children:
Our salaries reflect the higher end of the market value for each post in particular sectors, and they are reviewed annually to ensure we continue to reward our staff appropriately.
The full-time annual leave entitlement is 29 days per annum plus bank holidays. After five years’ continuous service, your entitlement increases to 32 days per annum.
Fucking hell! START at 29 days?????
Plus they have a generous pension scheme and all the usual touchy-feely cock-stroking.
Think about that the next time you're tempted to give "just three pounds a month" ... it's doing fuck all to help Baby P, but it's doing PLENTY for Wes Cuell and his merry band of hectoring, nannying, unaccountable fuckmonkeys. And their pensions.
11 comments:
Precisely the reason I don't donate money to charity. It's resulted in some fairly heated exchanges with those tabbard-wearing cunts that stop you on your lunchbreak.
P.S. Isn't it ironic all the men photographed on that page wouldn't look out of place on a news story about an internet pedo ring being smashed?
Too fucking right - same thing with every large scale national charity, for example the RSPCA spend more each yeare on directors salaries than they do on protecting animals. There are some good charities around, for example Hope House Children's Hospice, but they are almost without exception small scale and local - therefore directly accountable. Lesson here?
The Penguin
Penguinus Smellsoffish
"It's resulted in some fairly heated exchanges with those tabbard-wearing cunts that stop you on your lunchbreak."
Funny. I've never been troubled by them. The only ones who continue past the aura of 'I'll rip your head off if you ask me for money!' I must project are the religious nuts. I guess they figure they'll just get to their reward quicker...
Agree with 'The Penguin' - no large-scale charities. Local only, and give them goods or your time. That prevents empire-building and the hiring of hangers-on.
I don't give to large scale charities any longer, either. I was at the point of joining the National Trust, thinking them to be an organisation that restored and maintained historical buildings and gardens for the benefit of the nation. I was astonished when the head of the National Trust was quoted as saying "On behalf of our six million members I would like to state, we feel that climate change to be the biggest issue facing us today". Who gave this cheeky bitch the mandate to say that? On what grounds? Was there a nationwide vote? My membership was immediately cancelled. I'm only one individual, but they can whistle for my subscription.
Andy.
The larger charities increasingly sound and behave like organs of the State and/or job creation schemes. In this context, the two are close to synonymous.
I'm not sure if there has been a detailed investigative study of how this came to pass - other than by stealth - but the appointment of arch-quangocrat, Suzi (Siouxsie?) Leather, as Chair of the Charities Commission certainly looks like an ominous symptom.
As a volunteer for a migrants' charity, I once went through the hoops of a Big Lottery funding application. The framework of the application asks a lot of unanswerable quantitative questions about how many ("members of the community" passim) will be involved and will benefit. Targets, targets, targets… The pseudo-scientific selection process shows all the hallmarks of having been designed by cash-guzzling consultants.
Quangos and cartels taking in each others' washing, and stuff the children. That's what it looks like from a distance.
The only charities I pay any attention to are the RNLI who (afaik) don't take Govt money and the Royal British Legion.
The larger charities increasingly sound and behave like organs of the State and/or job creation schemes.
They are an organ of the state.
You can download the accounts of all the big charities. It makes a ripping read. Basically, all the money goes to salaries and marketing aka fundraising. Some of them donate to other organisations that essentially do the same thing in a giant merry-go-round of money laundering.
Also checkout just how much cash & investments all the big names have. Millions and millions. They certainly don’t need anymore cash, they’re all sitting on bundles. And you never hear in the news about anything ever that they’ve actually done, especially in times of disaster.
It’s a tax on the stupid like the lottery.
Same here.
I do my bit (and I'm far far from rich) but I never donate to a large organisation. I'll give direct to a local charity (I want to see the eyes of the people spending the money) or I'll do the same when abroad where appropriate. Alternatively, I'll offer my time, skills or labour (you'd be suprised how valuable that is to a worthy charity).
Incidently, someone mentioned the RNLI?
"The RNLI currently pays £40,000 in licence fees annually to OFCOM for the use of radio channels in our station/boathouse radios, lifeguard radios, launching vehicles and pager system. Under OFCOM’s new pricing proposals this is set to increase by a staggering 600% to £260,000 per annum."
Crazy isn't it?
Pretty much the same here. Remember the NSPCC were up to their armpits in the satanic ritual scandal - you know, the one where there weren't any satanic rituals? Never mind, these bastards still stirred it up for their own nefarious ends.
I do give to charity, but like others here, it's the small ones. I will never, ever, under any circumstances whatsoever, give a groat to the NSPCC, Oxfam et al.
Child abuse is disgusting, but the fuckers that profit from it are also.
Councils receiving bonuses for reaching their target number of adoptions.. makes you wonder how many cases are fabricated / exaggerated.
This is sickening.
Post a Comment