The risk is that the impact of their parents' break-up can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of the death of their dog can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of their bicycle accident can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of discovering their parents are human can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of being forced to eat sprouts can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of realising James Bond isn't real can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
The risk is that the impact of seeing what happens when you pull daddy's finger can sometimes scar children for life - that is why there is a role for government to intervene.
Really Ed, I know you're a fucking idiot and all, but really, this is pathetic, even for you.
Update: It seems Bobshead feels the same way ...
1 comment:
With you completely. My parents split when I was about 12 (they actually reunited about 10 years later but that's not the point). They explained what was going on at the time, they didn't need the state to do that, and I'm not scarred. What scars me is paying about £20k a year in tax to the gorgon in No. 10. Now that makes me seriously bitter and twisted
Post a Comment