Christ, I see the mongtards of the Labour Party are still protesting that Nick Griffin should be "no-platformed". Some dickwad has just been on the news wittering on about how the leaders of the big three parties should not allow their MPs to appear next to the monocular mentalist. Sorry, the other monocular mentalist.
But fucking Jesus, folks, has anyone fucking noticed how well the fucking no-platform strategy has worked so far? I mean, the BNP was not allowed a platform up till now, and they managed to get electoral success. Nick Griffin is a fucking MEP, in an irony implosion of note. Giving the fuckers no platform hasn't done fucking shit to stop them.
So why the fucking fuck are people still trying to promote the idea? Jesus, Dianne Abbott just about tied herself in knots this morning trying to explain why she supported freedom of speech but the BNP shouldn't be allowed to air its views.
Labour is fucking shitting themselves over this one, and it's pretty clear why: they know that the BNP shares a massive amount of common policy and common ideology with them. They know that when people look at the BNP and Labour side by side, they're going to find them a lot more in common than different.
And nobody likes looking in the mirror and seeing the truth.
Update: I'm not sure why Justin appears to have snubbed me, but this is still a cracking post.
14 comments:
I've said before that we should openly debate them - and openly laugh at them.
Perhaps a little BNP song will help.
D
Labour: where debating is too intellectually insurmountable for them, so they squawk and shout words like "racists" and "ban them" instead.
Look what this twat John Mann Labour MP did to Griffin
As you say, these mongs are delivering max publicity on a plate to the BNP.
Beautiful irony was displayed on the 'Today' programme, when they put on Ken 'I used to be Mayor of London, y'know' Livingslime. He argued that they should not be given a platform because racist violence happens when they have publicity (no actual evidence provided, of course).
And this from a man who, when in office, personally provided a platform for some fundamentalist Muslim preacher with views at least as obnoxious as some of those of the BNP. Note also that the platform was provided for him to disseminate his views, and not for 'Question Time' style debate.
This irony was, of course, completely lost on the BBC, who failed to challenge Livingslime on this point (I guess because he is a member of the same Islington luvvie-leftie club).
The usual balanced BBC view then.
The inclusion of meaningless obscenities detracted nothing from a terrific analysis, Obno.
Mighty white of you to say so. :o)
Nice Summary OBO, but the mash has done it better.
Labour are making a fuss because scaremongering about the BNP helps shore up their core vote, not because of the effect it has on the BNP.
Twenty years ago, the BBC fancied they were fighting their corner against Thatcher by using Terry Wogan to dub Gerry Adams's voice.
Of course, if the BBC had ever pressed Republicans to justify their indiscrimate murder of non-combatants instead of lapping up their every weasel word without challenge, no such pantomime would have been necessary in the first place.
It's because the fellow socialists will be worried the BNP message will reverberate with their voters.
That fucking Nick Griffin....
Waste of a white skin.
Interesting post Obo
Why the fuck are the UAF protesting that he`s on the Question Time Show....
Usually its as dull as dishwater, at least now it might get a bit interesting.
And guess what ...opponents can actually ask Nicky some Questions..how is that a bad thing...or are they scared they wont have a devastating response..
It will probably just end up with a load of shouting and the show will be stopped...
Good or bad there is still a universe out there...
"......when people look at the BNP and Labour side by side, they're going to find them a lot more in common than different."
'cepting Keith Vaz & Dianne Abbott eh?
So you don't think that Keith Vaz & Dianne Abbott want to promote "their race" at the expense of others?
They're race-hustlers just like Nick G is.
This could get confusing, as they are both lacking an eye, maybe one could be issued with eyepatch.
Nick could have one with an N on it, whilst Gordon could have one with the letter C to signify what a complete utter one he is.
Post a Comment