Friday, 20 August 2010
New blog-tag
Just because of cunts like Kingbingo accusing me of reneging on anarchism just because I appreciate the occasional bit of non-anarchist thinking as it applies to the "here and now" rather than the way I'd like to live, I'm going to try and tag such posts with "non-anarchist thinking" so that I don't confuse obvious dimbulbs by approving of some non-anarchist thinking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
This is not the way to go, Obo. Soon, you will end up being a Labour Party member, a deficit denier, a man with levels of delusion that not even Sunny Hundal will be able to beat.
You should do as I do, and vote Conservative. I just do it because I can't be bothered thinking for myself, so the Tories tell me what to think and who to vote for. Therefore, I vote Conservative. And you should too.
This is not the way to go, Obo. Soon, you will end up being a Labour Party member, a deficit denier, a man with levels of delusion that not even Sunny Hundal will be able to beat.
You should do as I do, and vote Conservative. I just do it because I can't be bothered thinking for myself, so the Tories tell me what to think and who to vote for. Therefore, I vote Conservative. And you should too.
Joking aside...
“just because I appreciate the occasional bit of non-anarchist thinking as it applies to the "here and now"”
I bet your doctors like you to spend a bit of time in the ‘Here & Now’.
But I like your psychosis here. Your split into two distinct personalities. One of whom I can have a sensible conversation with and read your blog and be inspired. The other one spends most of his time trying to eat his own shoes while muttering something about how private warlords can torment you to their hearts content, and its all cool because they don’t have a name badge on from a state agency. And regularly comparing me to Gordon Brown and Joe Stalin as an arch statist because I only think the state should be trimmed by 90% and not 100%.
So you didn't read this then?
“So you didn't read this then?”
Yes did you? He doesn’t say they won’t, just that it would not be more harmful than the same concept, except when it is called a state.
The thing is a state for all its faults, it is not particularly arbitrary. Your solution would be.
You think that you have the option to tell the private warlord to go screw himself, but you can’t do that with state. Actually you can say it to both, you just won’t like the consequences of either.
Kingbingo:
"Your split into two distinct personalities."
Are you accusing Obo of 'cognitive dissonance', Kingbingo?
If you had internecine instead, you could cover all the posts I don't like!
As well, surely?
Dimbulbs? I have a couple in my hallway.
Kingbingo in the hallway?
Sorry, two Kingbingos!
And I'll bet neither can spell.
Actually, Anonymous, 3 Kingbingos one after another.
Pop.
Pop.
Pop.
[interjection by Obo]
Pop.
Post a Comment