Did anyone call me? If you did, you're a cunt. If you didn't, you're a cunt. Obnoxio's a cunt, Tom Harris is a cunt, I'm a cunt, and you're a cunt if you're still reading this.
Except if you're my felching friend Boatang. I love you, Boaty. Everyone else is just a cunt.
J Demtriou, that really is quite funny did you know that?
I don't think you're a cunt by the way, just a sad little prick.
Whilst your sad little comments are achieving a smirk on Obo's face while being posted on this quickly sinking shit hole, trolling really isn't big and really isn't clever. Much like your cock and you.
By the way, do you get the irony of attempting to take the piss out of John calling people cunts on a site whose single purpose is to call everyone a cunt?
Twat.
If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up. Whcih he won't, because he really is a cunt.
"trolling really isn't big and really isn't clever"
Well, it is funny. And a really good troll is very clever.
"If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up."
Why would he do that? And why would anyone listen to him?
Anyway, my mind's starting to boggle now, because I just realised that I can't work out if you're really KB or if you're just another alt of the troll.
"How many times, we just have views, we don't profess to have the definitive answers to everything. Why can't you accept that?"
Gosh, that's a bit of a climb down then? Who wrote this, for example:
"People need to seriously wake up and realise that not only are we the real deal, the top Dons of political blogging, but we are actual Gods of Writing. No-one surpasses us or even comes close."
Or this:
"And just in case you were in any doubt, Mr Boatang and I are indeed Demi-Gods of the Libertarian blogging world, and yes, everything that we utter is sacred"
Was that someone else then?
"By the way, my blogger profile is now set to distinguish myself from fake pricks and obo cock suckers etc"
Actually, I reckon with a little bit of effort, anybody could set up a profile that would be pretty much indistinguishable from what you've got there. So I'm still none the wiser.
Thanks so much for the profile and links to our site! Fantastic stuff! Who needs PR work when we have mugs like you doing our work for free?
Of course, if anyone want to check if it was the real JD or the fake one, they could simply check the JD profile and see the date given for when the blogger signed up.
Mine, the real one, is 2008. The fake one June 2010.
Simple.
Obo...
Your quotes: how does this prove me wrong in anyway, how does this invalidate my point?
Do I ever say anywhere that my views trump all and profess the real one true libertarianism? No. So you're blowing hot air you cock.
Cheers for all the publicity lately though, it's been great. Marvelous for exposure. Can't complain at that.
You and fake JD need to crank up the efforts though. When I employ slaves, I want them to really earn their crusts of JD attention.
"Your quotes: how does this prove me wrong in anyway, how does this invalidate my point?"
"we don't profess to have the definitive answers to everything"
"We like it this way - it helps us to remain focused and keep our vision clear on how and why we are right.
We are very consistent and good at being right about things."
Is this better? Perhaps a little clearer?
Do tell me JD, when was the last time you conceded anything about libertarianism? And how many times have you conceded something vs how many times you've waved your cock about how you're right and everyone else is wrong?
I haven't read any post or comment that I can recall you saying "actually, you've got a point there". You always start off from position X and then defend it robustly -- which is fine, but then why do you expect anyone to regard you as anything but an intransigent mule?
I am constantly accepting other arguments, constantly making small compromises and concessions. I do it all the time.
I'm amazed you've missed it.
Yes, I say we are 'good' at being right. Of course I would say that. I believe we are good at getting it right.
But I do, and have often, admitted mistakes and misconceptions. I do embrace other views and I do digest them.
And yes, to an extent, you have convinced me of the importance of wealth creation from the top, the validity of private property rights and 'my land, my rules' (to an extent, not entirely, but you've moved me from my slightly further out position).
Your writing on far east sweat shops for example was good, it had meat on the bones, it got me thinking. I still think public pressure and boycotts and personal choice in the market where morality plays a hand is important, but you got me thinking and I have moderated my position.
I honestly can't understand why you say these things. WHy you have such a problem with us.
[note to readers: my profile reveals my blogger since date as 2008, not 2010, which is the date at which the fake fraudulent JD set up his identity theft account in my name]
"I honestly can't understand why you say these things."
Because, John, I'm not a fucking psychic. You may have moved on in your thinking, but your bombastic balls to the wall attitude is unchanged and what you write doesn't look any different to me.
I don't expect you to suck anyone's cock, but if you have moved on in any given direction, it would be nice if you wrote that you'd moved on so that the rest of us could be aware of this.
I'm not revisiting your epistles to the bloggertarians to work out the nuances of how your positions have changed, they're hard enough work the first time.
"WHy you have such a problem with us."
I don't. I don't have a problem with anyone. You still storm around slapping your cock on the table everywhere you go and banging on about what a fucking god you are.
A misplaced ego of that size is far too tempting to take the piss out of.
But as for having "a problem with you", that exists solely in your head.
"But you go too far. You write up pieces about us and hound us down, and berate and caper. What's the point? It's obsessional."
Says the man who fucked up the comments in every single post I've made in the last 48 hours with this shit. The man who declared that all other Libertarian bloggers were going to go to the wall now that the Tories were in power. The man who blatantly trolls twitter pretty much every time he logs on.
Boatang, my fellatio friend! How nice to see you join me. Perhaps I should explain this one to you - I don't want to have to call you a cunt. You say: "If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up. Whcih he won't, because he really is a cunt."
You misunderstand, my fellating friend. Obnoxio almost certainly thinks I am a cunt, and I definitely think he's a cunt. It's mutual, so it works.
I'm glad it makes sense to you now. Now, shall we try some felching?
24 comments:
Your fault, anyway.
ROFLFAO
Or JD's clone... err troll.
Squawk!
Did anyone call me? If you did, you're a cunt. If you didn't, you're a cunt. Obnoxio's a cunt, Tom Harris is a cunt, I'm a cunt, and you're a cunt if you're still reading this.
Except if you're my felching friend Boatang. I love you, Boaty. Everyone else is just a cunt.
Oh yes, nearly forgot to say one other thing.
Squawk!
Lunchtime now, and it's been deleted. Must have been a very long breakfast this morning for our Tom.
J Demtriou, that really is quite funny did you know that?
I don't think you're a cunt by the way, just a sad little prick.
Whilst your sad little comments are achieving a smirk on Obo's face while being posted on this quickly sinking shit hole, trolling really isn't big and really isn't clever. Much like your cock and you.
By the way, do you get the irony of attempting to take the piss out of John calling people cunts on a site whose single purpose is to call everyone a cunt?
Twat.
If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up. Whcih he won't, because he really is a cunt.
Not that anyone's reading what yousay.
"this quickly sinking shit hole"
On what basis do you claim this?
"trolling really isn't big and really isn't clever"
Well, it is funny. And a really good troll is very clever.
"If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up."
Why would he do that? And why would anyone listen to him?
Anyway, my mind's starting to boggle now, because I just realised that I can't work out if you're really KB or if you're just another alt of the troll.
Or both!
You sad old fart. Why don't you get back into your car and go fix someone's internet connection you fat fucking lanky haired useless prick.
Oh, and you are on the slide mate. Bit like Steve 'why aren't you funny anymore?' Martin.
You had your day, now the shocker comments, rants and ditties about being on the road are just plain boring, and by your own stats measures, useless.
Really? Gosh, well, I guess I'll just give up and slink away with my tail between my legs.
The mighty god of libertarianism has spoken.
Bwaaahahahahahahaha!!!
You love that old line, don't you you fucking bell end.
How many times, we just have views, we don't profess to have the definitive answers to everything. Why can't you accept that?
By the way, my blogger profile is now set to distinguish myself from fake pricks and obo cock suckers etc
Just so you know.
"How many times, we just have views, we don't profess to have the definitive answers to everything. Why can't you accept that?"
Gosh, that's a bit of a climb down then? Who wrote this, for example:
"People need to seriously wake up and realise that not only are we the real deal, the top Dons of political blogging, but we are actual Gods of Writing. No-one surpasses us or even comes close."
Or this:
"And just in case you were in any doubt, Mr Boatang and I are indeed Demi-Gods of the Libertarian blogging world, and yes, everything that we utter is sacred"
Was that someone else then?
"By the way, my blogger profile is now set to distinguish myself from fake pricks and obo cock suckers etc"
Actually, I reckon with a little bit of effort, anybody could set up a profile that would be pretty much indistinguishable from what you've got there. So I'm still none the wiser.
But I have to say, full marks for effort.
This looks like a fun game. Can anyone play?
Dear fake JD
Thanks so much for the profile and links to our site! Fantastic stuff! Who needs PR work when we have mugs like you doing our work for free?
Of course, if anyone want to check if it was the real JD or the fake one, they could simply check the JD profile and see the date given for when the blogger signed up.
Mine, the real one, is 2008. The fake one June 2010.
Simple.
Obo...
Your quotes: how does this prove me wrong in anyway, how does this invalidate my point?
Do I ever say anywhere that my views trump all and profess the real one true libertarianism? No. So you're blowing hot air you cock.
Cheers for all the publicity lately though, it's been great. Marvelous for exposure. Can't complain at that.
You and fake JD need to crank up the efforts though. When I employ slaves, I want them to really earn their crusts of JD attention.
Cheerio!
"Your quotes: how does this prove me wrong in anyway, how does this invalidate my point?"
"we don't profess to have the definitive answers to everything"
"We like it this way - it helps us to remain focused and keep our vision clear on how and why we are right.
We are very consistent and good at being right about things."
Is this better? Perhaps a little clearer?
Do tell me JD, when was the last time you conceded anything about libertarianism? And how many times have you conceded something vs how many times you've waved your cock about how you're right and everyone else is wrong?
I haven't read any post or comment that I can recall you saying "actually, you've got a point there". You always start off from position X and then defend it robustly -- which is fine, but then why do you expect anyone to regard you as anything but an intransigent mule?
YOu don't read us much then!
I am constantly accepting other arguments, constantly making small compromises and concessions. I do it all the time.
I'm amazed you've missed it.
Yes, I say we are 'good' at being right. Of course I would say that. I believe we are good at getting it right.
But I do, and have often, admitted mistakes and misconceptions. I do embrace other views and I do digest them.
And yes, to an extent, you have convinced me of the importance of wealth creation from the top, the validity of private property rights and 'my land, my rules' (to an extent, not entirely, but you've moved me from my slightly further out position).
Your writing on far east sweat shops for example was good, it had meat on the bones, it got me thinking. I still think public pressure and boycotts and personal choice in the market where morality plays a hand is important, but you got me thinking and I have moderated my position.
I honestly can't understand why you say these things. WHy you have such a problem with us.
[note to readers: my profile reveals my blogger since date as 2008, not 2010, which is the date at which the fake fraudulent JD set up his identity theft account in my name]
"I honestly can't understand why you say these things."
Because, John, I'm not a fucking psychic. You may have moved on in your thinking, but your bombastic balls to the wall attitude is unchanged and what you write doesn't look any different to me.
I don't expect you to suck anyone's cock, but if you have moved on in any given direction, it would be nice if you wrote that you'd moved on so that the rest of us could be aware of this.
I'm not revisiting your epistles to the bloggertarians to work out the nuances of how your positions have changed, they're hard enough work the first time.
"WHy you have such a problem with us."
I don't. I don't have a problem with anyone. You still storm around slapping your cock on the table everywhere you go and banging on about what a fucking god you are.
A misplaced ego of that size is far too tempting to take the piss out of.
But as for having "a problem with you", that exists solely in your head.
Like I said, I say what I see.
I talk my talk, say my peace, discuss, debate and explain the brilliance of Boaty & D (which is undoubted).
Take it or leave it.
But you go too far. You write up pieces about us and hound us down, and berate and caper. What's the point? It's obsessional.
All because you don't like seeing someone self-promote and tell the world what they think.
As an American, I'm amazed you take such a dim view of self confidence and self promotion. I thought you lot were all up for that sort of enterprise.
"But you go too far. You write up pieces about us and hound us down, and berate and caper. What's the point? It's obsessional."
Says the man who fucked up the comments in every single post I've made in the last 48 hours with this shit. The man who declared that all other Libertarian bloggers were going to go to the wall now that the Tories were in power. The man who blatantly trolls twitter pretty much every time he logs on.
You odd man! you encouraged all this and a minute ago you said you were enjoying all this!
strange man!
sorry obby, I'll go away if you want!
I talk my talk, say my peace, discuss, debate and explain the brilliance of Boaty & D (which is undoubted).
I bet you think this song is about you, don't you?
it's not vanity, frog, it's just the way it is.
"Like I said, I say what I see."
And somehow, when I say what I see, it's a vindictive campaign in support of my AnCap agenda.
For fuck's sake man, why don't you stop digging?
Champagne comedy :)
Boatang, my fellatio friend! How nice to see you join me. Perhaps I should explain this one to you - I don't want to have to call you a cunt. You say: "If Obo was any sort of blogger of course he'd ask you to shut the fuck up. Whcih he won't, because he really is a cunt."
You misunderstand, my fellating friend. Obnoxio almost certainly thinks I am a cunt, and I definitely think he's a cunt. It's mutual, so it works.
I'm glad it makes sense to you now. Now, shall we try some felching?
Squawk!
Post a Comment