Boys are seen as "funny", "cheeky", "playful" and "loving" whereas girls are viewed as "stroppy", "argumentative", "eager to please" and "serious".
Or perhaps it's just that girls are much more stroppy because they have an even worse hormonal issue than boy?
Despite 48 per cent deeming it wrong to do so, almost nine mums in ten admitted treating girls and boys differently, according to the survey conducted by the parenting website Netmums.
Oh for Christ's sake. Really? Boys are treated differently to girls? Perhaps they're treated differently because they're different fucking people with different fucking behaviours.
More than one in five questioned let their sons get away with more and turned a blind eye to behaviour in boys for which they would reprimand their girls.
Well, just to consider one example which is weighing heavily on my mind at the moment: if my son fucks around, he's not going to get pregnant, is he? I can chastise him for his irresponsibility, but ultimately I'm not going to be left carrying the can of all the emotional crap if he does get some bird preggers. Her parents are going to have to deal with that, whatever the financial consequences might be. So there is one immediate reason why I would be harder on my daughter than on my son.
But Jesus, imagine parents having the utter temerity to treat their kids differently? Do they not know of Harriet Harman's equality legislation?
Fuckers.
12 comments:
The left won't rest until we are all genderless, emotionless, thoughtless drones. Like them.
This country has already got to the point where men who actually earn a living or own their own home are terrified of getting married because a woman can at a whim ‘cash in’ and get 50% of everything, no questions asked.
The last thing we need is the bleeding hearts turning their attentions to kids. Or next thing you know if the parents of a young lad who got some girl preggers will have to hand over 50% of their entire net worth and remortgage half their house in order to pay over to the girl in question to support the kid’s kid. If you got 3 lads you could be wiped out and living on benefits inside a couple of years.
And don’t think I’m being alarmist. This will fooking happen if Harman types get their way.
Btw, does anyone know what has happened to Anna Raccoon?
She's fucked off. Some continuation here.
"Despite 48 per cent deeming it wrong to do so, almost nine mums in ten admitted treating girls and boys differently"
Or to put it another way, only 48% can be bothered to give the 'right' answer when questioned. That school indoctrination not working as well as hoped?
kingbingo - see Grumpy Old Twat
I have just read her parting post on: http://grumpyoldtwat.blogspot.com/2010/10/final-words-of-anna-raccoon.html
I feel awful for her. I also feel awful for me, I loved that blog, the standard was phenomenal. It was gold, pure gold. Anna herself was commentator without equal. That easily applies to all the paid journalists and commentators. She was their better by far.
She was a truly brilliant blogger and I’m sure a wonderful human being. Her writing was fluid and engaging her points sharp, her messages deep. Oh how I would love to be able to write like her. Oh how privileged I was to be able to read her while I did.
The left and its hate, its vile twisted unhand rot. They have claimed a scalp, as they undermine so many. Delingpole has a great piece out at the moment about how one hater spent years twisting 5,428 Wikipedia entries to remove truth, and subvert the message: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100059077/professor-hal-lewis-is-not-an-irrelevant-senile-old-fool/
But these people cannot stamp out right-minded thinking, the truth. Because although at any British school and every time we turn on the BBC we are actively brainwashed to the opposite. But right-minded thinking is instinctive. We love people like Anna because she so eloquently wrote about that which we know to be true.
If there was something I could do for Anna I would. Tragically I do not think there is so instead I shall be reading her cached article lamenting it will be decades at least until us libertarians have another of her quality to write what we feel.
Welcome back, Obo. You've been sorely missed..
The first Mrs Rab fucked off with 50% of my pension contributions and it cost me £700 in 'fees' on top.
Worth every fucking penny, the trumpet that she is.
But we split the house 50/50.
She got the inside, I got the outside.
Not that I'm bitter, the cow.
Rab, know how you feel.
When you go to a barrister and she says it's gonna cost you £30,000 and 2 years to contest £20,000 with no guarantees, and agrees with you that despite you being right, the law is not on your side to support you, you certainly think twice about geeting married again in the UK until prenups are legalally binding.
Vermin like Harridan have a lot to answer for.
I remember not voting for that animated pisspot Wilson because as far as I could see he was cutting education and defence spending hand in hand. His reasoning was, I was convinced, that in a few years Brits would be so thick they wouldn't be worth defending. Plus ca change, then . . . level off at the lowest common denominator.
Harridan Harpyperson.
Who got her husband selected (& elected) in a vacant safe seat which was to have a women-only short-list. Go figure.
Post a Comment