Seriously? First off there's the idea that a violent man can be chucked out of his own home to give the family respite. Well, I don't have a lot of truck with spouse beaters (or spouses who put up with beatings for that matter) but for fuck's sake, if you own the house, and you get thrown out of a house you actually own or rent, WTF? Property rights?
And it's not like the perpetrator isn't going to know where to find the victim, is it? I'm sure they're going to feel a lot fucking safer with a DVLA order or whatever the fucking fuck you've decided to call it.
Then there's the "huts for sluts" program announced by the monocular mentalist today. Stolen, just like British Jobs for British Workers, from the fucking BNP.
Jesus fucking Christ, tell you what Gordon, here's a fucking vote-winner: why not round up all the blacks and make them live in one designated area, move all the Asians to another designated area and finally earmark all the best jobs for white people. There's even a fucking snappy name for this policy and you'll also achieve the idea of an undying legacy for your PM-ship. And a fucking 1000-year reich as well.
You fucking mad freak.
13 comments:
Huts for sluts - that's rather good.
Unfortunately, I think it comes from one of the tabloids. The best the blogosphere could manage was "gulags for slags" or "camps for tramps".
I am not sure if i like monocular mentalist or The Nutter with the stutter better?
http://newslion.blogspot.com/
What about "habs for chavs"?
Whoever thought putting dozens of chav femlaes that have just mated into a building together hasn't thought it through. Also C4 News. Heartenin to see Leicestershire plod guarding the Simmons from "vigilantes". The late Pilkington family were not shown as much tendresse.
Abtreibung macht frei?
It gets better, in the "huts for sluts"(tm) all these girls will sync their ....ahem monthlys and so we will have dozens of nutty women cooped up.....oh joy.
I notice that the banning orders that can throw a man out of his house apply where the police don't have evidence to bring any charges.
So it's conviction without charge again. Seems to be a favourite with this lot. Absence of evidence no longer equates to 'presumption of innocence'.
And no woman, anywhere, will ever make a false accusation after a row. Nor will any woman, anywhere, use this to control her husband in the same way that children use Childline to control their parents.
Could be worse. All they need is one suitably bribed doctor and it's off to Bedlam with you, for as long as they like.
Actually, that might be the best option soon.
Jesus fucking Christ, tell you what Gordon, here's a fucking vote-winner: why not round up all the blacks and make them live in one designated area, move all the Asians to another designated area and finally earmark all the best jobs for white people.
Don't fucking give him ideas - he'd win the next election if he did that.
round up all the blacks and make them live in one designated area, move all the Asians"Africa and Asua comes to mind.
Mitch that is a modern urban myth.
If you own the house you've just been thrown out of, don't you have a perfect right to have the locks changed? When your "other half" is not there, of course....
Even if he is called a playa by his friends, it’s not in a bad way…it’s actually seen as a good thing! If a girl were to do that she’d be seen as “easy” or a “slut”. Where’s the sense in that?
Post a Comment