You give me a lot more credit than I deserve JD. I have no "lot".
The truth of it is, for all that you can be a thought-provoking and interesting blogger at times, your irritating egotism and obsessive wittering about things that no-one gives a flying fuck about are blatantly obvious to anyone who reads your blog.
You're as egotistical as Old Holborn, you're as much of a drama queen as Old Holborn, but you lack his gumption and his ability to get people to feed his ego.
Obo, you are incorrect. There are no jealousy or projection issues. I genuinely think he is bad news for libertarianism and what he advances is a perverted, hoodwinking brand of freedom and liberty. Nothing good can come of his politics or campaigning.
Why is it wrong for me to write about that? No-one else does. Can it not be said that I at least give air to a legitimate position?
I don't care for love, attention or readership. My readership could shrink to a trickle, it bothers me not at all.
I am fully aware of how much my 'witterings' on this subject cause me to become the target for mass derision and disdain. I carry on, because I think what I say needs to be said, and I don't give a shit.
I don't want to be OH and I don't give a fuck what anyone thinks.
"My readership could shrink to a trickle, it bothers me not at all."
I think Obo nailed it.
I caught you before the country club fiasco (fiasco for you). Your stuff was interesting, but your signal to ego ratio has continuously declined.
You're with Guido in the 'best days are behind them category'. With him, I just read the stories and skip the comments. I don't often even remember to do that with your site any more.
You need professional psychiatric help (probably not for the first time)
9 comments:
Cutting, or Cunting?
If cunts could fly, those two would be squadron leaders.
I love being loathed and disdained by your lot. It makes me happy. Keep it up.
"My lot"?
You give me a lot more credit than I deserve JD. I have no "lot".
The truth of it is, for all that you can be a thought-provoking and interesting blogger at times, your irritating egotism and obsessive wittering about things that no-one gives a flying fuck about are blatantly obvious to anyone who reads your blog.
You're as egotistical as Old Holborn, you're as much of a drama queen as Old Holborn, but you lack his gumption and his ability to get people to feed his ego.
Perhaps that's why you hate him so much.
*applause*
That meant to say 'you lot', sorry, typo.
Obo, you are incorrect. There are no jealousy or projection issues. I genuinely think he is bad news for libertarianism and what he advances is a perverted, hoodwinking brand of freedom and liberty. Nothing good can come of his politics or campaigning.
Why is it wrong for me to write about that? No-one else does. Can it not be said that I at least give air to a legitimate position?
I don't care for love, attention or readership. My readership could shrink to a trickle, it bothers me not at all.
I am fully aware of how much my 'witterings' on this subject cause me to become the target for mass derision and disdain. I carry on, because I think what I say needs to be said, and I don't give a shit.
I don't want to be OH and I don't give a fuck what anyone thinks.
Thanks for the positive points though.
"My readership could shrink to a trickle, it bothers me not at all."
I think Obo nailed it.
I caught you before the country club fiasco (fiasco for you). Your stuff was interesting, but your signal to ego ratio has continuously declined.
You're with Guido in the 'best days are behind them category'. With him, I just read the stories and skip the comments. I don't often even remember to do that with your site any more.
You need professional psychiatric help (probably not for the first time)
"My readership could shrink to a trickle, it bothers me not at all."
COULD...hahahahahahahaha
Oooh, meee-OW! :o)
Post a Comment