Hypocritical Lefty Luvvie Twitter Talibanistas

I shan't go on about Caitlin Moron, who apparently can make all the violent threats, homophobic and ableist jokes or other trolling comments because "context", apparently.

Today I saw someone tweet about Graham Lineham blocking them while he (Graham Lineham) was dishing out abuse. I read the tweets in question and there was no fucking "context" there at all. Lineham was just calling people cunts. Tonight I saw him concur with Frankie "I can dish it out but I'm a big frit girl's blouse when I get it" Boyle saying that if his block button killed people, it would be a nicer place.

(Just revel in the fact there for a moment that the man who made his career out of being offensive wants to kill people who he finds offensive. Jaw-dropping, isn't it?)

I'm sure I could go on (and on and ON) finding other examples of hypocritical lefty luvvie twitter talibanistas if I wanted to, but you get the point.

I'm not really sure how different this is from me calling for the heads of hypocritical lefty luvvie twitter talibanistas (HLLTT's) on pikes, but apparently, when I dish abuse out, it's vile, when HLLTT's do it, it's funny and, y'know, "context".

From my perspective, I don't have a problem with Lineham or Moran or anyone else being abusive in the name of being funny. What I do find unbearable is them smugly pontificating about "abuse" and "politeness" while they do exactly the same things they're describing as being unacceptable and even worse, their armies of cock-sucking windowlickers actually having the temerity to justify it.

Either it's acceptable or it's not, if Moron or Lineham or Boyle can do it, why can't I?

Iz it becoz she iz black?

@bimadew White people love playing "divide & rule" We should not play their game #tacticasoldascolonialism

-- Diane Abbott, MP

Now, correct me if I'm wrong here, but if I'd tweeted something like:

@HackneyAbbott Black people love playing at being thugs and sleeping around with as many lovers as possible #pastimesasoldastime

I would be condemned and vilified as a racist. Yet I am still to see one of the lefties I follow having a go at her. Is it because she's one of their tribe? Or is it because she's black and therefore can't be racist?

Why is it acceptable to make sweeping generalisations about one race and not about others?

The Cunt Persecution Disservice

We've all heard the stories about these cocksniffers, picking up spurious cases and prosecuting stuff that anybody with half a brain cell could see weren't justified and then equally mysteriously dropping slam-dunk cases ... such as against MPs or pillars of the judicial system. Maybe there's a reason for this curious behaviour:

A corrupt senior Crown prosecutor who pocketed cash to use his position to discontinue a case had spiralling debts of almost £1 million, a jury has heard.

Sarfraz Ibrahim, 51, of Cyncoed, Cardiff, South Wales, admitted corruption and related charges on Monday, on the eve of his trial.

As Gwent Crown Prosecution Service trials unit chief he had the power to stop a case in its tracks by recommending no further action.

He admitted charges of corruption, attempting to pervert the course of justice and misconduct in public office. His pleas mean Ibrahim has admitted pocketing £20,000 to ensure the case of a man he believed to be guilty was discontinued.

Funny that, eh? Might be something to bear in mind next time these fuckers make a curious judgement call.

Just. Fuck. Off. You. Utter.

Cunt:

Taxis home can only be claimed after 11pm. One woman MP says:

What happens on a January night in London? I suppose I will have to take the tube, then a bus and then a long walk home. That is not safe.

Well, you fucking cunt, then why don't you fucking work on making the fucking cuntry a fucking safer place, you utter, utter cuntstain? Rather than just leeching off the taxpayer?

Am I missing something?

The normally fairly astute Dizzy asks an interesting question:

This could soon become very interesting, because, if it's sustainable (still questionable) and the Lib Dems came first in the popular vote, they would probably still end up only the third largest party in the Commons. If that happened then PR will be inevitable, after all, none of the other parties could win the argument that the system produces an equitable outcome.

So, let;s play a game for a second, imagine the Lib Dems won the popular vote but were the third largest party. Would we perhaps see a very short Parliament that produced just one law change, the introduction of proper PR along the lines of the Single Transferable Vote, and then a quick dissolution and General Election under the new system?

Given the Teflon-coated behaviour of politicians since 1997 and the complete apathy of the British public, what makes him think that whoever wins would give a fuck about "winning the argument that the system produces an equitable outcome"?

Dizz, baby, I don't know if you've noticed, but our politicians don't give a flying fuck what we think.

The Mark Thomas Privacy Product

I don't often agree with this egregious lefty twat, BUT:

Last I checked, I wasn't above the law. The same rules that apply to you also apply to me. And I'm a celebrity!

So it seems rather obvious that the people who often set these rules - our MPs - should also live by them.

But they don't - especially when it comes to how government treats our personal information. And it's time we put a stop to it.

Tell every would-be MP standing for election in your area that you'll no longer accept one rule for them and another for all of us.

All our children are now documented on the government's ContactPoint database, but MPs can get their children "shielded" for the sake of their privacy. What about our privacy?

Hundreds of MPs voted in favour of each and every one of us being fingerprinted for the ID database and having an ID card. Yet I'm sure I don't have to tell you that very few MPs have chosen to get one, even though they're now available to those who volunteer.

But what should we expect? After all, dozens of these same MPs voted to exempt themselves from the Freedom of Information Act, all in the name of their "privacy" of course, whilst passing laws that erode all of our privacy.

I've had enough of these hypocrites, haven't you? Join us in demanding that all candidates commit to scrapping the ID card scheme, and to defending our privacy - and that of our children - as fiercely as they defend their own:

http://www.power2010.org.uk/privacy

Tell your local cunts what you think of them.

One rule for us...

... it's the same the world over:

For as long as the political fight took over the past year, the abbreviated review process on the health care legislation currently pending on President Obama’s desk is unquestionably going to result in some surprises — as happens with any piece of mashed-up legislation — both for the congressmen who voted for it and for the American people.

One such surprise is found on page 158 of the legislation, which appears to create a carveout for senior staff members in the leadership offices and on congressional committees, essentially exempting those senior Democrat staffers who wrote the bill from being forced to purchase health care plans in the same way as other Americans.

It's cunts all the way down, clearly.

But seriously, if this fucking "Obamacare" is all fucking that, why are the motherfuckers who wrote the bill exempting themselves from it?

And why do cunts let them get the fuck away with this shit?

Quote of the picoweek

DK:

This does not alter the fact that we know that almost every other cunt in Parliament is a thieving shitbag with the morals of an alleycat.

#Climategate - 1200 Limos, 140 Private Jets in #Copenhagen

Utter fucking hypocritical cock-sucking cunts.

When you're in a fucking hole, what is rule number one?

Could it be: "stop digging"?

Evidently not:

A day after apologising to the House of Commons for claiming second home allowances on a house in which he let his parents live rent-free, the Labour MP came out fighting to defend his colleagues over the expenses scandal.

He told GMTV: "It may be a system that the people don't like, and I understand the debate around that, but I think overwhelmingly the MPs have not been fiddling, diddling and going into criminality."

Of course not, you mendacious cock-sniffing fuckmonkey.

The house, in his constituency of Harrow East, where he admitting staying a maximum of 66 days in a year, is just eight miles from the “main” home he shares with his wife.

I spend about 66 days a year from home, and I don't get the chance to fund a second fucking house out of it, you arrogant cunt weasel. And EIGHT FUCKING MILES from your main home?

Fuck off you cunt. You got off fucking lightly. Shut the fuck up and be grateful, or we will be fucking come for you with pitchforks and torches.

Fuck the Commons

I just don't understand this fucking shit:

Tony McNulty, the former Labour minister, will be ordered to repay more than £13,000 he claimed in expenses for his parents’ home.

A parliamentary inquiry will also order the MP to make a public apology in the House of Commons.

I'm fucking sorry, mister "parliamentary enquiry", but why is one thieving troughing cunt apologising to the other fucking troughing cunts? Why the cunting fuck is this fucking thief not apologising to US? It is, after all, us he fucking stole the money from.

And how does a grudging "apology" to your fellow troughers constitute a punishment? Why is this fucker not heading for jail?

The great and the good

I've been struck by how the political class has become much more complacent in their arrogance. I can only assume that politicians and their coterie have been troughing since forever, but they were more discreet or had sufficient military power to justify egregiousness.

We've obviously had our own massive troughing scandal here, we've had Barrenness Scotland and "the laws do not apply to me". We've had Jacqui Smith and her pathetic "punishment" for stealing from the public purse, we've had duck ponds and all the rest.

A couple of days ago, Arnie's missus got "done" for phoning while driving. Bet nothing happens to her, or even more likely: any "fine" will actually come from the public purse -- she is a Kennedy, after all. I'm sure that she has more in common with Cherie Blair than with Jackie Onassis.

And today comes the news that the Irish Speaker has been forced out of office after blatantly treating the public purse as his own private property.

Now, I've never bought into that "serve the public" shit. Anybody who genuinely wants to "serve the public" is a fucking nutter. And that "serving the public", even if it starts off with genuine humility, always winds up becoming how the servant wants to serve, not how the public want to be served.

Most of the people who say they want to serve the public are (how can we put this?) "being economical with the actualité". They really just want what they can get out of it.

There used to be a deal here: they would take what they wanted in exchange for actually doing things that made stuff better for (at least some of) us. And they did their taking discreetly and subtly, usually only getting rumbled when someone was dissatisfied with their share of the take and grassed them out to Private Eye.

And when they were grassed out, they had the good grace to take their licks, leave public life and retire on their ill-gotten gains.

But as the size of the political class grew, it inevitably grew to include a worse, more shameless class of trougher. One who wasn't motivated by a long-term financial gain or patronage. Now, we have small-minded, petty and egregiously venal troughers. People who aren't happy with a long game, they want their financial rewards up front. They don't want discreet patronage, they want to bully and boss and hector and micromanage their serfs. They don't want to salt away huge wedge over decades, they want to take the huge wedge up front AND do the back-room dirty deals that sock money away in Swiss bank accounts.

All I can say is that it's been self-defeating. They have waved their cocks in our faces far too blatantly. Even the slumbering, bovine amoeba that the average Briton has become, is starting to become offended. It's going to be nasty for a couple of years, but I finally think that the tipping point is coming.

So, milk away, you troughers. Keep spying on the contents of our bins. Tell us what we are allowed to eat. Enjoy fucking with our lives.

Because you're going to find that eventually you will denormalise enough of us that you won't be able to keep the lid on the pot any more. You will reap the whirlwind and it will be bloody.

I've gone beyond the point where I feel that I "just" want the government out of my face. I want to see blood. I want heads on pikes. I want people to be too fucking scared to stand for political office for a hundred years -- I want people dragged screaming into a Parliament or Council, begging to be excused duty.

Enough, you motherfuckers, is enough.

Game changed, or just a hiccup?

While worshipping at the altar of St Arbucks today, I read the front page of the Graun. It was given over to a discussion of yesterday's twitter slaughtering of the nonsense of the Graun not being able to report matters of Parliament.

I will admit that I felt a deranged sense of pride for a minute, I thought: "I helped do that."

And then I wondered whether winning this battle meant that we had won the war? I'm not sure, really,I can't see the self-righteous, overweening, make-the-law-up on the spot cunts who run this country taking this lying down.

And I expect there's going to be a good few more skirmishes before it all settles down into state-sanctioned and monitored oppression again.

I fully expect some incredibly draconian legal framework to get enacted off the back of this. It's not going to be pretty.

There are more worrying thoughts here.

Oh, I'm laughing now ... a bit

Schadenfreude is a terrible thing. But let's face it, the buck-toothed troughing cunt is more deserving than most:

The Bar Standards Board has received a number of complaints about the beleaguered Cabinet minister, who was fined £5,000 for employing an illegal immigrant.

The development further intensifies pressure on Lady Scotland to step down amid growing concern within Labour that the affair will dominate this week's party conference.

Oh ho! Just imagine if the Attorney-General was sacked from the bar. Oh, I don't think I'd stop laughing for a week!

Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, has been accused of showing weakness by failing to sack Lady Scotland, who said in interviews last week that her breach of immigration law could be compared with failing to pay London's congestion charge.

Gordoom? Accused of weakness? Let's face it, folks, compared to the Gorgon, even the Italian army looks good, never mind the French!

The most senior law officer in England and Wales avoided the sack despite becoming the first individual in the country to be sanctioned for breaching immigration rules that she helped frame as a Home Office minister. All other prosecutions have covered companies.

The irony of this is matched only by the brass neck of the Barrenness in question.

The Bar Standards Board does not normally investigate complaints about a lawyer's private life, but its own guidelines acknowledge that such an inquiry may be launched in "exceptional circumstances".

A spokeswoman for the board declined to comment about Lady Scotland's case and refused to disclose how many complaints had been received.

Senior legal sources have told this newspaper that the Bar Standards Board would have no alternative but to carry out an inquiry into whether the QC breached the barristers' code of conduct and brought the legal profession into disrepute.

The board was created just three years ago as part of the Bar's attempt to retain its self-regulating role, and failing to act could leave the organisation open to criticism, said lawyers.

"I have no doubt that the Bar Standards Board will deal with this properly and take appropriate action," said one QC.

Members of the disciplinary panel may now have to consider whether Lady Scotland's activities have been "dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister".

The board has the power to disbar a lawyer who is found to have committed a serious breach of the code. Even if a lesser punishment is imposed – such as a fine, suspension or reprimand – it could be fatal to Lady Scotland's political career.

Well, the only thing that gives me pause is that by rights, the smug, overweening and egregiously entitled fucking authoritarian jumped-up hectoring whore should already have fucked off. But the fact that she doesn't think that breaking the law is any kind of hassle for an A-G, and the fact that Labour Party feels the same way, and the fact that Her Majesty's Loyal but Supine and Useless opposition have just let this one slide the same way they let every other fucking thing slide means that I reckon the Barrenness will just tough this fucker out. Let's face it, folks, politics has become a staring contest, and with a man who was sacked from politics twice by Labour (no fucking mean achievement considering what you have to do to get sacked by these troughing thieves) now effectively running the country, I don't think there's much chance of this jumped-up little trougher walking the plank.

She's survived major troughing allegations and being the first private person to be prosecuted under her own law. I can't see the Bar doing anything that will shift her.

I must admit ...

... my immediate reaction was exactly the same as that of the first windowlicker over at Guido:

Hahahahahaahahaahahahahahaha!!!!!

Back of the net!

when I read this:

+++ Source : Tapui Denies Showing Baroness Passport +++
+++ No Evidence Husband Alexander Zivancevic is a Solicitor +++

UPDATE : There are questions as to the status and paperwork for Alexander Zivancevic. UKBA having problems establishing his right to residence. Oh dear…

I can only assume that Guido feels that the Barren-ness is about to get her arse handed to her on a silver platter. And about fucking time, too.

Update: I see Max Clifford has joined the party. This is going to get SO fucking messy. If Barren-ness Cuntland has an iota of sense, she will resign now. Because tomorrow it's going to be too late.

A false dawn?

I see Stephen Hesford has flicked a V at Barrenness Cuntland and done something approaching honourable. I'm sure he will not lose a lot of his troughing privileges, but at least he's made the manic mincing madman look like a cunt and hopefully the egregiously entitled erminer (with her fake baubles) will take the hint and fuck off.

I seriously doubt it, though. Seriously, can you see any of the top table of Labour ever doing anything remotely honourable? Ever?

It was like not paying the congestion charge

Smell the entitlement and arrogance...

Oinkety oink oink!!

Food prices going up 18%? Not in Wastemonster:

The maximum rise in the price of any item sold in the Parliamentary catering establishments will be capped at five per cent this year - despite food and drink prices rising by more than 18 per cent in supermarkets.

The deal, agreed by senior MPs at a meeting last month, means the taxpayer will have to provide a £5 million subsidy for food and drink sold within the Palace of Westminster.

Like we don't pay the fuckers enough already, they're pushing their fucking food bills onto us.

Nice work if you can get it.

Cunts.

Margaret "Three Caravans" Beckett?

No. Yet another greedy trough-snuffler caught fiddling the books:

HOUSING minister Margaret Beckett today became the latest Cabinet minister to be engulfed in the "three homes" row.

How apt. The Three Housing Minister.

No, no, no. It's just a handful of bad apples and it's all within the rules anyway.

Her spokesman said: "Nothing has ever been done outside the rules of Parliament."

See? It's all fine and dandy and we're all pissed about nothing. Bless 'em?

No. On second thoughts, hang them all, the bastarding greedy fucks.

Oink, oink, oink ...

It's only a handful of bad apples, you know:

Alistair Darling has claimed thousands of pounds in expenses on his family home despite owning a London flat which he rents out - and living in a grace-and-favour apartment in Downing Street.

The Chancellor - the man in charge of the nation's finances - has repeatedly changed the designation of his 'main home' over recent years, the Daily Mail has learned.

The switches enabled him to charge the taxpayer thousands of pounds towards both his £1.2million Edinburgh townhouse and a new London apartment.

In addition, he has been pocketing cash from rent.

It's all within the rules, you know! There are only a handful of bad apples, you know! Politicians work hard, you know!

Lies, lies, lies. You motherfuckers are stealing from us, you're bullying us and you're making our lives a fucking misery. I can't find the words to express my burning rage.

Death by 1000 cuts would be too fucking kind for the lot of you.

Update: Guido has a go.

As does the Penguin. Did I beat him this time?

Update 2: Timmy identifies another possible porkie.